- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part One
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Two
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Three
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Four
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Five
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Six
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Seven
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Eight
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Nine
- The Electrical Distribution Architecture – Part Ten
Today, I will introduce a complete Checklist for application of Electrical Distribution architecture design process a follows.
Checklist for application of Electrical Distribution architecture design process
This Checklist is exclusive for our blog, you will not find it anywhere in the web, when you use it , it will make your design more professional, more applicable and give more Credibility in front of the client.
This checklist is a summary for all the previous tenth topics and By using this Checklist, you will be able to list all the characteristics, factors and conditions that affect the design of the power architecture design (single line diagram) for any project.
What you need to do is putting (√ ) in the check box in front of the right choice , the previous topics listed above will help you for determining the right choice and you can review them for this purpose.
A solved example in the next topic will show how using this Checklist to design and draw an optimal single line diagram for the project under study. Please, review this check list very well and inform me if there is any question.
Here is the check list,
Checklist For Application Of Electrical Distribution Architecture Design Process
| |||
(Put Brief Description About The Installation/Building)
| |||
First: Assigning Of Electrical Installation Characteristics
| |||
#
|
Characteristic
|
√
|
Choice
|
1
|
Activity
|
Industrial Buildings
| |
Commercial Buildings
| |||
Residential Buildings
| |||
Agricultural Buildings
| |||
Educational Buildings
| |||
Transportation Buildings
| |||
Religious Buildings
| |||
Parking And Storage
| |||
Military Buildings
| |||
Governmental Buildings
| |||
Cultural Buildings
| |||
Other Buildings
| |||
2
|
Site Topology
|
Single Storey Building,(Low Rise)
| |
Multi-Storey Building, ,(Low Rise)
| |||
Multi-Building Site,
| |||
High-Rise Building
| |||
3
|
Layout Latitude
|
Low (≤ 2,000 m2)
| |
Medium (2,000 m2- 2,500 m2)
| |||
High (> 2,500 m2)
| |||
4
|
Service Reliability
|
Minimum
| |
Standard
| |||
Enhanced
| |||
5
|
Maintainability
|
Minimum
| |
Standard
| |||
Enhanced
| |||
6
|
Installation Flexibility
|
No Flexibility
| |
Flexibility Of Design
| |||
Implementation Flexibility
| |||
Operating Flexibility
| |||
7
|
Power Demand
|
< 630 kVA
| |
630 – 1250 kVA
| |||
1250 - 2500 kVA
| |||
> 2500 kVA
| |||
8
|
Load Distribution
|
Uniform Distribution
| |
Intermediate Distribution
| |||
Localized Loads
| |||
9
|
Power Interruption Sensitivity
|
“Sheddable” Circuit
| |
Long Interruption Acceptable
| |||
Short Interruption Acceptable
| |||
No Interruption Acceptable.
| |||
10
|
Disturbance Sensitivity
|
Low Sensitivity
| |
Medium Sensitivity
| |||
High Sensitivity
| |||
11
|
Disturbance Capability Of Circuits
|
Non Disturbing
| |
Moderate Or Occasional Disturbance
| |||
Very Disturbing
| |||
12
|
Other Considerations Or Constraints
|
Environment
| |
Specific Rules
| |||
Rule Of The Energy Distributor
| |||
Attachment Loads
| |||
Load Power Supply Constraints
| |||
Second: Assigning Of Technological Characteristics
| |||
1
|
Environment And Atmosphere
|
Standard (IP,IK,C°)
| |
Enhanced (IP,IK,C°)
| |||
Specific (IP,IK,C°)
| |||
2
|
Service Index
|
111
| |
211
| |||
223
| |||
232
| |||
233
| |||
332
| |||
333
| |||
3
|
Other Considerations
|
Designer Experience
| |
Utilities Requirements
| |||
Specific Technical Criteria
| |||
Third: Using Architecture Assessment Criteria
| |||
1
|
On-Site Work Time
|
Secondary
| |
Special
| |||
Critical
| |||
2
|
Environmental Impact
|
Non significant
| |
Minimal
| |||
Proactive
| |||
3
|
Preventive Maintenance Level
|
Standard
| |
Enhanced
| |||
Specific
| |||
4
|
Availability Of Electrical Power Supply
|
Availability Level (%) = (1 - MTTR/ MTBF) x 100
| |
Forth: Step (1): Choice Of Distribution Architecture Fundamentals
| |||
1
|
Connection To The Upstream Network
|
LV Service
| |
MV Single Line Service
| |||
MV Single Line- One Substation - One Ring Main Unit Service
| |||
MV Double Line - One Substation - Double Ring Main Unit - One Loop Service
| |||
MV Duplicate Supply Service,
| |||
MV Duplicate Supply Service With Double Busbar.
| |||
2
|
MV Circuit Configuration
|
Single Feeder, One Or Several Transformers
| |
Open Ring, One MV Incomer
| |||
Open Ring, 2 MV Incomers
| |||
3
|
Number And Distribution Of MV/LV Transformation Substations
|
1 Substation With N Transformers (If Power < 2500KVA)
| |
N Substations With N Transformers (Identical Substations) (If Power >2500KVA)
| |||
N Substations With M Transformers (Different Powers) (If Power >2500KVA) (For Several Buildings)
| |||
4
|
Number Of MV/LV Transformers
|
The Number Of Transformers (> 1) (If Power > 1250 KVA) (Area > 5000m2)
| |
The Number Of Transformers (= 1) (If Power < 1250 KVA)
| |||
5
|
MV Back-Up Generator
|
Yes (Site Activity - Total Power Of The Installed Loads - Sensitivity Of Circuits To Power Interruptions -Availability Of The Public Distribution Network)
| |
No
| |||
Fifth: Step (2): Choice Of Architecture Details
| |||
1
|
Layout
|
Place power sources as close as possible to the barycenter of power consumers,
| |
Reduce atmospheric constraints: building dedicated premises
| |||
Placing heavy equipment (transformers, generators, etc) close to walls or main exists for ease of maintenance,
| |||
2
|
Centralized Or Distributed Layout
|
Centralized Layout
| |
Decentralized Layout
| |||
3
|
Presence Of Back-Up Generators
|
Yes (Sensitivity of loads to power interruption, Availability of the public distribution network)
| |
No
| |||
4
|
Presence Of An Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)
|
Yes (Sensitivity of loads to power interruptions, Sensitivity of loads to disturbances)
| |
No
| |||
5
|
Configuration Of LV Circuits
|
Radial single feeder configuration
| |
Two-pole configuration
| |||
Variant: two-pole with two ½ MLVS
| |||
Shedable switchboard (simple disconnectable attachment)
| |||
Interconnected switchboards
| |||
Ring configuration
| |||
Double-ended power supply
| |||
Configuration combinations
| |||
Sixth: Step (3): Choice Of MV/LV Equipment (Atmosphere, Environment, IP, IK - Service Index - Offer Availability Per Country - Utilities Requirements )
| |||
Seventh: Recommendations For Architecture Optimization
| |||
1- Use of proven solutions and equipment that has been validated and tested by manufacturers (“functional” switchboard or “manufacturer” switchboard according to the application criticality)
| |||
2- Prefer the implementation of equipment for which there is a reliable distribution network and for which it is possible to have local support (supplier well established)
| |||
3- Prefer the use of factory-built equipment (MV/LV substation, busbar trunking) allowing the volume of operations on site to be limited
| |||
4- Limit the variety of equipment implemented (e.g. the power of transformers)
| |||
5- Avoid mixing equipment from different manufacturers.
| |||
6- Appropriate metering and analysis of loads actual consumption
| |||
7- Power factor correction solutions
| |||
8- Appropriate organisation and design of site and use of busbar truncking instead of cables wherever accurate
| |||
9- Reducing the length of LV circuits in the installation by Placing MV/LV substations as close as possible to the barycenter of all of the LV loads to be supplied
| |||
10- Clustering LV circuits wherever possible to take advantage of the factor of simultaneity ks by:
| |||
a- Setting up sub-distribution switchboards as close as possible to the barycenter of the groups of loads if they are localized
| |||
b- Setting up busbar trunking systems as close as possible to the barycenter of the groups of loads if they are distributed.
| |||
11- Focus maintenance work on critical circuits,
| |||
12- Standardize the choice of equipment,
| |||
13- Use equipment designed for severe atmospheres (requires less maintenance).
| |||
14- Reduce the number of feeders per switchboard, in order to limit the effects of a possible failure of a switchboard
| |||
15- Distributing circuits according to availability requirements
| |||
16- Using equipment that is in line with requirements (SI index)
| |||
17- Follow the selection guides proposed for steps 1 & 2
| |||
18- Change from a radial single feeder configuration to a two-pole configuration,
| |||
19- Change from a two-pole configuration to a double-ended configuration,
| |||
20- Change from a double-ended configuration to a uninterruptible configuration with a UPS unit and a Static Transfer Switch
| |||
21- Increase the level of maintenance (reducing the MTTR, increasing the MTBF)
|
Download your copy Here.
In the next topic, I will explain an example for using Electrical Distribution Architecture Design Process Checklist. So, please keep following.
I cant believe ALL of this fantastic information is FREE.... Thank You, Thank you, Thank you .....
ReplyDeleteThank You Eng. ail
DeleteAmazing stuff! Like so many others, my company is cutting back on expenses and training has taken a big hit. I am in charge of a team of junior designers and using this site will enable them to be more self sufficient whilst leaving me to do more of the boring management stuff that I'm paid to do. Thank you to all of the contributors for helping knowledge to grow by sharing their skills.
ReplyDelete